HPE Storage Users Group

A Storage Administrator Community




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: new disks added to 7400
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:31 am 

Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 4:43 pm
Posts: 62
Davidkn wrote:
Be interested to know how long this tunesys takes please.


It's still running...so close to 24-hours and it's on tune 2 of 4
"Tune 2 of 4 started..."

Tune 1 finished after about 12-hours. On the first tune, I ran a showtask -d 123 on the initial tunesys task...then it spun off task 124, so showtask -d 124.

Came in this morning, and task 124 was done, so I ran a showtask to see all of them and there was this guy

482 background_command tunenodech active 1/2 389/1831

389 of 1831 GBs to move...I'll report back at the end of the day.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: new disks added to 7400
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:18 pm 

Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 4:43 pm
Posts: 62
2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated 1769/1831 GB (1769/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated
2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated No further chunklets can be moved for the current set of disks
2015-01-20 15:33:02 CST Updated
2015-01-20 15:33:04 CST Updated
2015-01-20 15:33:04 CST Updated Target moves to achieve node balance: 1831 GB (1831 chunklets).
2015-01-20 15:35:43 CST Updated 1779/1831 GB (1779/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)

skipping ahead a bit...

2015-01-20 16:13:45 CST Updated 1916/1831 GB (1916/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
2015-01-20 16:16:20 CST Updated 1926/1831 GB (1926/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)
2015-01-20 16:18:15 CST Updated 1936/1831 GB (1936/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: new disks added to 7400
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:39 pm 

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:01 am
Posts: 390
Architect wrote:
RitonLaBevue wrote:
Rather than tunesys which must be run a lot of times before having nice results, we use tunevv.


from what i've seen, that issue is finally fixed in 3.2.1
tunesys had some issues tuning R6 before that release.



You mean tunesys really balance datas through pds ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: new disks added to 7400
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:43 am 

Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 138
RitonLaBevue wrote:
Architect wrote:
RitonLaBevue wrote:
Rather than tunesys which must be run a lot of times before having nice results, we use tunevv.


from what i've seen, that issue is finally fixed in 3.2.1
tunesys had some issues tuning R6 before that release.



You mean tunesys really balance datas through pds ?


Yes, and from what i saw, it does it quite nicely as well. As long as the system is balanced of course.

_________________
The goal is to achieve the best results by following the clients wishes. If they want to have a house build upside down standing on its chimney, it's up to you to figure out how do it, while still making it usable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: new disks added to 7400
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:23 am 

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:01 am
Posts: 390
Nice, just have to wait for PD upgrade on 3.2.1 then ^^


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 237 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group | DVGFX2 by: Matt