| HPE Storage Users Group https://www.3parug.com/ |
|
| new disks added to 7400 https://www.3parug.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1117 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | mohuddle [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new disks added to 7400 |
Davidkn wrote: Be interested to know how long this tunesys takes please. It's still running...so close to 24-hours and it's on tune 2 of 4 "Tune 2 of 4 started..." Tune 1 finished after about 12-hours. On the first tune, I ran a showtask -d 123 on the initial tunesys task...then it spun off task 124, so showtask -d 124. Came in this morning, and task 124 was done, so I ran a showtask to see all of them and there was this guy 482 background_command tunenodech active 1/2 389/1831 389 of 1831 GBs to move...I'll report back at the end of the day. |
|
| Author: | mohuddle [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new disks added to 7400 |
2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated 1769/1831 GB (1769/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed) 2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated 2015-01-20 15:32:57 CST Updated No further chunklets can be moved for the current set of disks 2015-01-20 15:33:02 CST Updated 2015-01-20 15:33:04 CST Updated 2015-01-20 15:33:04 CST Updated Target moves to achieve node balance: 1831 GB (1831 chunklets). 2015-01-20 15:35:43 CST Updated 1779/1831 GB (1779/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed) skipping ahead a bit... 2015-01-20 16:13:45 CST Updated 1916/1831 GB (1916/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed) 2015-01-20 16:16:20 CST Updated 1926/1831 GB (1926/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed) 2015-01-20 16:18:15 CST Updated 1936/1831 GB (1936/1831 chunklets) moved to underallocated disks for devtype FC (Last moves: 0 misses, 0 failed) |
|
| Author: | RitonLaBevue [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new disks added to 7400 |
Architect wrote: RitonLaBevue wrote: Rather than tunesys which must be run a lot of times before having nice results, we use tunevv. from what i've seen, that issue is finally fixed in 3.2.1 tunesys had some issues tuning R6 before that release. You mean tunesys really balance datas through pds ? |
|
| Author: | Architect [ Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new disks added to 7400 |
RitonLaBevue wrote: Architect wrote: RitonLaBevue wrote: Rather than tunesys which must be run a lot of times before having nice results, we use tunevv. from what i've seen, that issue is finally fixed in 3.2.1 tunesys had some issues tuning R6 before that release. You mean tunesys really balance datas through pds ? Yes, and from what i saw, it does it quite nicely as well. As long as the system is balanced of course. |
|
| Author: | RitonLaBevue [ Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new disks added to 7400 |
Nice, just have to wait for PD upgrade on 3.2.1 then ^^ |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|